Maximizing the utility of failure

24 05 2011

Not specifically a “fail fast” blog post but Dave Kellog recently expressed his thoughts on the value or structuring/designing business initiatives to allow for drawing specific conclusions based on the results of the initiative.

He argues that the results of the initiative should clearly indicate whether it was a repeatable failure or a repeatable success.

Thus, my statement: if we can’t have repeatable success, then can we at least have repeatable failure?

He is describing one of the ways to maximize the utility of failure (and/or also success in this case) through critical thinking and considering the possibility of failure while still planning.

A “test” that yields inconclusive results due to the way it was structured (i.e. could have yielded conclusive results with an alternative formulation) should not be considered failing fast.


Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.